ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Impact of prophylactic anticoagulation on hospitalized COVID-19 patients aged over 80 years: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictors of Severe Outcomes in COVID-19: Evidence from Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Study (2020-2024).Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividuals aged 80 and older face a notably increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and mortality after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clinical guidelines recommend routine pharmacological thromboprophylaxis, yet its application in oldest-old patients remains insufficiently studied.
aimsTo assess the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients aged 80 years and older.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter, prospective cohort study enrolling in-hospital COVID-19 patients aged ≥ 80 years from six tertiary hospitals in China between December 2022 and January 2023. The clinical outcomes were VTE, all-cause mortality and bleeding events. Patients were followed up for 3 months after discharge. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to identify risk factors and evaluate the impact of LMWH prophylaxis on clinical outcomes.
resultsAmong 1526 patients aged ≥ 80 years, 41.6% received LMWH prophylaxis. LMWH prophylaxis significantly reduced VTE risk by 50% (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.75) and mortality risk by 20% (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.99), without increasing bleeding risk (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.60-1.34). Male, history of stroke, critical illness on admission and hemoglobin < 90 g/L were identified as risk factors of bleeding. LMWH prophylaxis remained effective in preventing VTE and demonstrated favorable safety particularly in male patients and patients with hemoglobin < 90 g/L. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionLMWH may be safe and effective for thromboprophylaxis in the oldest-old COVID-19 patients, even in patients with high bleeding risk. Further studies are needed to verify our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.