ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid method combining rule-based filter and machine learning to detect porpoise and vessel sounds from a pulse event recorder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Passive acoustic monitoring is essential for assessing the impact of anthropogenic noise on marine ecosystems and detecting vocalizing marine life. While acoustic event recorders are widely used to record odontocete echolocation due to their low power and memory demands, conventional detection algorithms are often unsuitable for analyzing datasets composed of complex pulse events. Here, we developed a hybrid analytical framework combining a rule-based filter with a random forest model to efficiently detect narrow-ridged finless porpoise (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis) click trains and vessel noise events using data from the pulse event recorder. The rule-based filter effectively reduced noise from raw data, achieving detection accuracy of almost 100% for click trains and 94% for vessel noise. However, among the events detected by this filter, 45% and 81% were actually false positives. The machine learning model improved classification accuracy to 97% and 99%, respectively. This model reduced the high false positive rates to 2.8% and 0.1%. This combined method offers a robust and efficient approach to processing pulse event recorder data, specifically for A-tag. It reduces manual workload, improves detection accuracy, and facilitates rapid assessment of vessel noise impacts, thereby supporting long-term ecological monitoring of small cetacean populations in diverse and noisy marine environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.