ArticleScientific reports2025
The association between self-checked visual field impairment and motor vehicle accidents among Japanese taxi drivers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this cross-sectional study, we investigated the association between visual field impairment (VFI) and motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) among Japanese taxi drivers. We also evaluated the usefulness of a self-check test, the CLOCK CHART, as a screening tool for VFI. We recruited 1,227 male Japanese taxi drivers from 2018 to 2019. The CLOCK CHART detected defects (CCDD) were recorded as VFI. We collected data on visual field (VF)-related near miss incidents and MVAs over the previous five years using a self-administered questionnaire. A multivariable-adjusted generalized linear model was used to examine the association of the combination between CCDD and VF-related near misses with MVAs. We conducted a follow-up survey among 326 participants with CCDD to determine the proportion of newly diagnosed glaucoma. The proportion of MVAs was 61.9%, with a multivariable-adjusted prevalence ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.22 (1.05-1.41) for MVAs in the group with both CCDD and VF-related near misses compared to the group without these factors. Further, 14 of these participants were newly diagnosed with glaucoma. A higher prevalence of MVAs was found among taxi drivers with both CCDD and VF-related near misses than for those without these factors. The CLOCK CHART may aid in identifying asymptomatic glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.