Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855252›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Community-embedded eldercare services and wellbeing of urban older adults aged 60 to 69 in Shanghai.

Puxiang Ren, Søren Harnow Klausen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Puxiang RenSchool of Government, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China. renpuxiang@shupl.edu.cn.
Søren Harnow KlausenDepartment for Design, Media and Educational Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

Shanghai University of Political Science and Law 2024XYB11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-embedded eldercare is a new approach to eldercare that allows older adults to remain embedded in their communities while giving them access to professional care, thus seemingly combining the best of home care and institutional care. The article reports and analyzes the findings from an interview- and questionnaire-based study of urban older adults aged 60 to 69 receiving community-embedded eldercare in Shanghai, focusing on its impact on their wellbeing and potentially mediating factors. The findings are analyzed by means of cognitive appraisal theory and structural equation models. They confirm that both community-embedded eldercare as such and perceptions of it influence older adults' wellbeing positively, highlighting the role of intergenerational support, community support, community interaction, and economic support, thus also corroborating theoretical assumptions that older adults tend to give more importance to intrinsic rather than instrumental values and that they come to focus more strongly on the emotional aspects of their life.

Indexed as

Health Services for the AgedAgedChinaFemaleHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban PopulationCognitive appraisal theoryCommunity-embedded eldercareOlder adults’ wellbeingStructural equation model

Identifiers

PMID40855252
PMCPMC12378224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.