Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855246›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimizing brain stroke detection with a weighted voting ensemble machine learning model.

Reeta Samuel, Thanapal Pandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Reeta SamuelSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632 014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Thanapal PandiSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632 014, Tamil Nadu, India. thanapal.p@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain stroke is a medical trauma that occurs when there is an impairment or decrease in blood circulation to a particular part of the brain, causing adjacent brain cells to die. Stroke diagnosis after an event is an ineffective method; other more labour-intensive and costly procedures exist for stroke diagnosis. This method involves directing a machine learning algorithm to a marked dataset to identify samples and irregularities indicative of stroke occurrence. This study focused on developing an ensemble machine learning model to predict brain stroke. The model combined the predictions of multiple individualistic classifiers, including random forest, eXtreme gradient boosting, and histogram-based gradient boosting, to improve accuracy. The proposed weighted voting-based ensemble (WVE) classifier model achieved an accuracy of 92.31% on a private stroke prediction dataset. The pre-assessment of stroke risk diagnosis, as suggested in this study, enables many people to take preventive actions well in advance, thereby lowering fatal effects. Our proposed method presents a feasible option for the early or initial diagnosis of stroke, as traditional methods, such as computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs), are time-consuming and costly. Future research could explore the use of intelligence-based optimization to enhance classification accuracy and address this limitation.

Indexed as

BrainMachine LearningStrokeAlgorithmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTomography, X-Ray ComputedVotingBrain stroke detectionEXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)Histogram-based gradient boosting (HGB)Machine learning (ML)Random forest (RF)Weighted voting

Identifiers

PMID40855246
PMCPMC12378966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.