Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855230›Full record

ArticleNature food2025

Biodiversity pressure from fruit and vegetable consumption in the United Kingdom, India and South Africa varies by product and growing location.

Abbie S A Chapman, Rosemary Green, Genevieve Hadida, Harry Kennard, Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, Pauline Scheelbeek, Carole Dalin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature food, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abbie S A ChapmanInstitute for Sustainable Resources, University College London, London, UK. abbie.chapman@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-2046
Rosemary GreenFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5850-6715
Genevieve HadidaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1176-4589
Harry KennardUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-0768
Tafadzwanashe MabhaudhiFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9323-8127
Pauline ScheelbeekFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6209-2284
Carole DalinInstitute for Sustainable Resources, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2123-9622

Funding

RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) NERC NE/N01524X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 205200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many countries around the world, fruit and vegetable consumption must increase to improve human health, potentially pressuring local and global biodiversity. Here we use biodiversity-pressure metrics to compare the biodiversity pressures associated with fruits and vegetables consumed in the United Kingdom, India and South Africa. We found that biodiversity pressure for individual crops varies greatly with origin. In all three countries, imported fruits are typically associated with greater pressure than domestically grown fruits. Contrastingly, in India and South Africa, imported vegetables generally have a lower biodiversity pressure than domestically grown vegetables. Oranges, popular in the United Kingdom and South Africa, exert almost three times more biodiversity pressure than bananas-one of the most-consumed fruits in the United Kingdom and India. Our analysis illustrates the quantification of crop-specific biodiversity pressures and provides evidence for the development of more sustainable food systems.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDietFruitVegetablesCrops, AgriculturalHumansIndiaSouth AfricaUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40855230
PMCPMC12454118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.