ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a prediction model for new vertebral fracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for subsequent vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty: a systematic review and critical appraisal.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Risk Prediction Models for New Vertebral Fracture After Vertebral Augmentation in Elderly Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is one of the primary treatment options for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). New vertebral compression fractures (NVCF) are common complications following PKP. This study aims to identify risk factors associated with NVCF after PKP and to develop a simple and user-friendly predictive model to assist clinicians in decision-making. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, analyzing clinical data from 340 patients with single-segment OVCF who underwent PKP at our institution between January 2020 and December 2022. We collected general clinical data and imaging findings from patients who underwent PKP at our institution. Lasso regression was employed to identify risk factors for NVCF after PKP, and the selected variables were further analyzed using an unrestricted cubic spline function. Finally, a predictive model was established using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The variables selected by Lasso regression included pre-op AVH (OR = 0.853) and vertebral height restoration rate (OR = 4.318). Restricted cubic spline function analysis demonstrated that patients with a pre-op AVH of less than 19.2 mm had a significantly increased risk of NVCF after PKP. Pre-op AVH and anterior vertebral height restoration rate are independent risk factors for NVCF after PKP. The predictive model constructed based on these two independent risk factors can effectively assess the risk of NVCF in elderly patients with OVCF undergoing PKP, providing valuable guidance for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.