ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving intelligent perception and decision optimization of pedestrian crossing scenarios in autonomous driving environments through large visual language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A data-efficient 3D medical vision-language model using only a 2D encoder.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study leverages large Visual Language Models (VLM) to develop an intelligent pedestrian crossing scenario system within autonomous driving environments. By establishing standardized checklists and prompts, the system minimizes the risks of misjudgment and omission through multimodal data processing. It offers data-driven decision-making support, presenting an innovative approach to integrating autonomous driving technology with intelligent transportation systems. The study begins by classifying pedestrian crossing scenarios based on international autonomous driving standards, distinguishing between pedestrian crossings and autonomous vehicle crossings, as well as dynamic and static entities. Next, standardized prompts derived from these standards are fed into the VLM, generating structured scenario checklists of dynamic and static entities, outputted in JSON format. This systematic identification and processing of entities-such as pedestrians, vehicles, and traffic facilities-enables the construction of structured data representations for complex traffic scenarios. Building on this foundation, the VLM analyzes scenario data to predict collision risks by modeling the behaviors of both pedestrians and vehicles, supporting real-time decision-making for autonomous vehicles and road users. Furthermore, the VLM processes scene data to anticipate potential conflicts and provide actionable safety recommendations, enhancing the overall security of all traffic participants. The system achieved a perception accuracy of 93.05%, with risk prediction consistency and decision-making rule consistency rates of 85.91% and 87.72% respectively. By constructing a VLM-based intelligent pedestrian crossing perception system, this study offers a novel technical framework for improving perception, prediction, and decision-making in autonomous driving. Unlike traditional rule-based and deep learning approaches, which struggle with complex pedestrian behaviors and dynamic environments, our method integrates visual perception with reasoning capabilities, enabling structured, standardized, and explainable decision-making in pedestrian crossing scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.