ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2025
Radiation therapy for lung cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to use highly complete data from publicly and privately funded radiation therapy centers to describe national-level receipt of radiation therapy for those diagnosed with lung cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand.
methodsWe linked national health datasets to New Zealand Cancer Registry lung cancer registrations from the period 2012-2019 (n = 18,081) to describe the radiation therapy delivery overall and in terms of treatment intent patterns, for all lung cancer registrations and by tumor type. We use marginal standardization and regression modeling to describe the extent to which these treatment factors vary by patient characteristic and population sub-group, independent of other factors.
resultsAround 40% of people with lung cancer had radiation therapy, with similar proportions among those with small cell lung cancer (SCLC, 53%) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 46%). Patterns of radiation therapy among those with SCLC were different from NSCLC and from lung cancer overall, in terms of stage, ethnicity, and deprivation. We observed lower rates of radiation therapy among those with the greatest socioeconomic deprivation among those with SCLC. Across all tumor types, and for lung cancer overall, those with higher comorbidity had lower rates of radiation therapy.
conclusionWe observed variation in the receipt of radiation therapy for people diagnosed with lung cancer in 2012-2019 in Aotearoa New Zealand in terms of tumor type, stage, ethnicity, deprivation, and comorbidity but not rurality. Differences for Asian and Pacific people and the lack of variation by rurality are potential topics for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40855146What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.