Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855141›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2025

Mortality and recurrence in acute ischemic stroke of all etiologies according to ultrasonographic assessment of carotid and aortic arch plaques: a prospective study.

Giuseppe Miceli, Maria Grazia Basso, Alessandra Casuccio, Andrea Roberta Pennacchio, Elena Cocciola, Mariagiovanna Cuffaro, Martina Profita, Chiara Pintus, Giuliana Rizzo, Antonino Tuttolomondo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Giuseppe MiceliDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy. miceli.gpp@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-2523
Maria Grazia BassoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Alessandra CasuccioDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Andrea Roberta PennacchioDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Elena CocciolaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Mariagiovanna CuffaroDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Martina ProfitaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Chiara PintusDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Giuliana RizzoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Antonino TuttolomondoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), Università degli Studi di Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carotid duplex ultrasound helps to determine the degree of stenosis or occlusion and characterizes plaque composition and vulnerability, which is crucial for stroke risk stratification. Recurrent ischemic stroke poses a significant risk to individuals, with about one-third of stroke survivors experiencing a repeat event within 5 years. Large-artery atherosclerosis, such as carotid, aortic, and femoral arteries, further increases the risk of recurrent strokes and influences prognosis. Moreover, stroke can result in worse outcomes, including higher morbidity, mortality, and cardiovascular complications in the 3 years after. In recent years, a simple, non-invasive ultrasound evaluation through the suprasternal notch has been proposed for identifying atherosclerosis of the aortic arch, with good sensitivity and specificity. Despite its non-invasive nature and growing clinical relevance, the prognostic utility of aortic arch ultrasound in the context of ischemic stroke of all etiologies remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the link between ultrasound characteristics of aortic and carotid plaques and the risk of mortality and recurrent stroke among patients with acute ischemic stroke. One hundred-eight patients with first-episode acute ischemic stroke, a mean age of 71.3 (13.4) years, underwent carotid Duplex and transthoracic aortic arch ultrasounds. They were followed up every 6 months for 3 years. The results revealed that while carotid plaques and stenosis were not significantly associated with recurrent stroke, the absence of plaques was associated with higher survival rates (p = 0.008). Conversely, the simultaneous presence of plaques in both the common and internal carotid arteries was associated with increased mortality (p = 0.004). Finally, echo-lucent intimal lesions, according to the Gray-Weale classification, are considered high-risk plaques and showed good sensitivity (89.6%) but poor specificity in predicting outcomes at 3 years (AUC = 0.63, p = 0.0164). These findings suggest that routine non-invasive ultrasound evaluation of both carotid and aortic arch can be beneficial in stratifying patients for secondary prevention and improving stroke care.

Indexed as

Aorta, ThoracicCarotid ArteriesIschemic StrokePlaque, AtheroscleroticStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overCarotid StenosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceUltrasonographyAortic atheromaAtherosclerosisCarotid plaqueRecurrent stroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.