ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Hormone replacement therapy and muscle loss: repeated measures analysis from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging using DXA.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the association between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and change in body composition in post-menopausal women in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe included postmenopausal women with repeated dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements and documented HRT status. HRT users were propensity score-matched to non-users based on baseline characteristics including age, height, weight, race, smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, education, age at menopause, age at first pregnancy, oral contraceptive use, and oophorectomy. Linear mixed-effects models assessed associations between current HRT use and longitudinal changes in fat and lean mass. Age was modeled as a time-varying continuous variable using piecewise linear splines at 60, 70, and 80 years. Interaction terms between HRT use and age were included to evaluate differences in age-related trajectories.
resultsHRT users (n = 91) and matched non-users (n = 220) had similar baseline characteristics. No significant interactions were found between HRT use and age for lean mass (all p > 0.05), and the likelihood ratio test (LRT) showed no improvement in model fit with interaction terms (p = 0.20). In contrast, fat mass trajectories differed by HRT status. Before age 60, HRT users experienced significantly greater fat mass gain (β = 596 g/year; 95% CI 75, 1117). After age 60, this reversed, with HRT users gaining 869 g/year less fat than non-users (β = -869 g/year; 95% CI - 1583, - 155), indicating a protective association of HRT after age 60. No significant differences were observed at ages 70 or 80. The LRT supported including interaction terms (p = 0.04).
conclusionHRT use is associated with less fat accumulation beyond the age of 60, although this association attenuates with advancing age. No differential association with lean mass was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40855137What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.