ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on microchannel fabrication in UV curable resin using combined beam processing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To break through the limitations of traditional rectangular microchannel processing methods for microfluidic devices, this paper proposes a processing technique based on a holographic combined femtosecond laser beam. The phase and topology of the hologram are adjusted by SLM to flexibly control the spot width and energy distribution of a generated Bessel beam, thus realizing high-precision and multi-size processing. To achieve high-precision microchannel sidewalls and bottom surfaces, the positive first-order Bessel beam is shifted at an appropriate position after the zero-order light by using a blazed grating to obtain the suggested holographic combined beam required for processing. At a laser power of 0.98 W, compared with using only the Gaussian beam (bottom roughness Ra of 0.361 μm, MRR of 882.219 μm³/s) and the Bessel beam (Ra of 0.377 μm, MRR of 3490.590 μm³/s), processing with the combined beam reduces Ra to 0.128 μm, a reduction by factors of 2.8 and 2.9, respectively. Meanwhile, the MRR increases to 6786.362 μm³/s, representing improvements by factors of 7.7 and 1.9, respectively. Under this power, when the phase value s increases by 4 pixels, the microchannel width increases by 3.2 μm, and when the topological charge n increases by 4 pixels, the microchannel depth decreases by 0.7 μm. This novel method, which enables smooth surfaces without the need for post-processing, offers a new option for the high-quality, efficient, and flexible fabrication of curable resin microfluidic devices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.