ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative outcomes of supraspinatus tendon reconstruction and superior capsule reconstruction for massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Expert consensus on reconstruction treatment for irreparable posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic Supraspinatus Tendon Reconstruction Using Hybrid LARS-Fascia Lata Graft for Irreparable Posterosuperior Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.JBJS essential surgical techniquesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) is established for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (IMRCTs). Supraspinatus tendon reconstruction (STR), a novel technique restoring muscle anatomy, lacks comparative studies with SCR. To compare STR and SCR efficacy in shoulder function, ROM, and radiological outcomes for posterosuperior IMRCTs. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 59 patients (SCR: n = 16; STR: n = 43) treated between December 2019 and November 2023. Outcomes included isokinetic muscle strength, active ROM (forward flexion [FF], abduction [ABD], external rotation [ER], internal rotation [IR]), patient-reported scores (VAS, ASES, Constant, UCLA), and radiological measures (acromiohumeral distance [AHD], Sugaya score, Goutallier classification). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in ROM, shoulder scores, and AHD postoperatively (P < 0.05). STR required shorter operative times (197.86 ± 32.88 vs. 291.25 ± 72.69 min, P < 0.01) and showed superior reductions in supraspinatus fat infiltration (Goutallier classification: P < 0.01) and greater gains in abduction (ΔABD: P = 0.021) and forward flexion strength (ΔFF: P < 0.01) compared to SCR. No differences were observed in VAS, ASES, or UCLA scores between groups (P > 0.05). Both techniques similarly improve shoulder function. STR demonstrates advantages in operative efficiency, muscle recovery, and mitigating fat infiltration, suggesting potential preference for posterosuperior IMRCTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.