Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855104›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multi-horizon prediction of tropical cyclone intensity and its interpretability with temporal fusion transformer.

Iyan E Mulia, Udai Shimada, Naonori Ueda, Takemasa Miyoshi, Madam Taqiyya Maulana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iyan E MuliaHydrography Research Group, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Technology, Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB), Bandung, Indonesia. iyan.mulia@itb.ac.id.
Udai ShimadaMeteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tsukuba, Japan.
Naonori UedaPrediction Science Research Team, RIKEN Center for Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Sciences, Kobe, Japan.
Takemasa MiyoshiPrediction Science Research Team, RIKEN Center for Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Sciences, Kobe, Japan.
Madam Taqiyya MaulanaHydrography Research Group, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Technology, Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB), Bandung, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting tropical cyclone (TC) intensity is challenging, involving numerous variables and uncertainty, especially for TC with rapid intensification (RI). One of the frequently used operational methods for such a case relies on statistical-dynamical models subjected to several limitations stemming from linear regression approximation to a complex TC system. This study proposes a new approach using a Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT) to overcome the limitations attributed to the conventional models. Besides improving accuracy, TFT is also known for its result interpretability, as opposed to the general perception that deep learning is purely a black-box model. Furthermore, the probabilistic nature of TFT facilitates prediction uncertainty quantification, an important feature and advancement to the standard deterministic prediction. We train and evaluate our model using the Western North Pacific basin TC observation and reanalysis datasets from 1996 to 2021. The results show that the prediction of TC intensity by TFT reduces the error of the conventional model by approximately 12% on average for all forecast horizons of up to 72 h, along with estimated uncertainty bands. A higher rate of 14% error reduction is attained specifically for TCs undergoing RI, an intractable phenomenon for the traditional modeling procedure.

Identifiers

PMID40855104
PMCPMC12379080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.