Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855101›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Central nervous system control of breathing in natural conversation turn-taking.

Camilla Di Pasquasio, Lila De Pellegrin, Arthur Pineaud, Antonin Marty, Thierry Chaminade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camilla Di PasquasioInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289 Aix-Marseille Université - CNRS, 25 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille cedex 5, France.
Lila De PellegrinInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289 Aix-Marseille Université - CNRS, 25 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille cedex 5, France.
Arthur PineaudInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289 Aix-Marseille Université - CNRS, 25 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille cedex 5, France.
Antonin MartyInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289 Aix-Marseille Université - CNRS, 25 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille cedex 5, France.
Thierry ChaminadeInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289 Aix-Marseille Université - CNRS, 25 Bd Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille cedex 5, France. thierry.chaminade@univ-amu.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CONV-0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conversations-hallmarks of human social interaction-rely on a deeply rooted evolutionary tool: vocalization. Vocalization productions begin with an airflow from the lungs, shaped by the vocal folds and articulators of the mouth to generate a rich variety of sounds. Speech production therefore involves tight synchronisation between respiratory and articulatory events, especially in natural social interactions. During conversations, turn-taking indeed implies respiration anticipation: lungs must be filled with enough air to produce the next speech segment. Here, we use an fMRI corpus of live, unconstrained conversations to identify key brain regions involved in the respiratory anticipation of speech onset. Behaviourally, respiratory local maxima preceded speech onset ("Resp+" events) by approximately 200 ms, consistent with volitional control of breathing overriding automatic respiratory rhythms. Contrasting Resp+ events with respiratory maxima not linked to speech onsets ("Resp-" events) revealed significant (p

Indexed as

Brain MappingCentral Nervous SystemMagnetic Resonance ImagingRespirationSpeechAdolescentAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBrainstemCentral sulcusCerebellumConversational turn-takingfMRIHuman communicationRespirationRespiratory controlSocial interactionSpeech breathing

Identifiers

PMID40855101
PMCPMC12378384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.