Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855055›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Incentivizing inclusive contributions in model sharing markets.

Enpei Zhang, Jingyi Chai, Rui Ye, Yanfeng Wang, Siheng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Enpei Zhang *Cooperative Medianet Innovation Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jingyi Chai *Cooperative Medianet Innovation Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Rui Ye *Cooperative Medianet Innovation Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yanfeng WangSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. wangyanfeng@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3196-2347
Siheng ChenSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. sihengc@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6199-529X

Funding

National Science Foundation of China | National Natural Science Foundation of China-Yunnan Joint Fund (NSFC-Yunnan Joint Fund) 62171276National Science Foundation of China | National Natural Science Foundation of China-Yunnan Joint Fund (NSFC-Yunnan Joint Fund) 62450162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data plays a crucial role in training contemporary AI models, but much of the available public data will be exhausted in a few years, directing the world's attention toward the massive decentralized private data. However, the privacy-sensitive nature of raw data and lack of incentive mechanism prevent these valuable data from being fully exploited. Here we propose inclusive and incentivized personalized federated learning (iPFL), which incentivizes data holders with diverse purposes to collaboratively train personalized models without revealing raw data. iPFL constructs a model-sharing market by solving a graph-based training optimization and incorporates an incentive mechanism based on game theory principles. Theoretical analysis shows that iPFL adheres to two key incentive properties: individual rationality and Incentive compatibility. Empirical studies on eleven AI tasks (e.g., large language models' instruction-following tasks) demonstrate that iPFL consistently achieves the highest economic utility, and better or comparable model performance compared to baseline methods.

Identifiers

PMID40855055
PMCPMC12379655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.