Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40855023›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Nasal Bone Anthropometric Analysis of 1022 Adult Turkish Patients Utilizing Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography: The Dorsal Profile Angle and Its Clinical Implications.

Umut Tuncel, Alperen Can Kokten, Goran Lazovic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Umut TuncelDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical Faculty, Samsun University, 55100, Samsun, Turkey. drumuttuncel@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5029-2927
Alperen Can KoktenDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical Faculty, Samsun University, 55100, Samsun, Turkey.
Goran LazovicDepartment of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Aurora Hospital, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnthropometric analysis of the nasal bone can establish parameters that significantly contribute to rhinoplasty outcomes. Key anatomical landmarks situated along the nasal dorsum, including the sellion, rhinion, and kyphion, can have significant angular relationships. Among these elements, the dorsal profile angle (DPA) and its corresponding point have been the least investigated to date. MATERIALS AND

methodsA comprehensive review of nasal bone anthropometrics using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images from 1022 randomly selected adult Turkish patients who applied for rhinoplasty at our clinic between 2022 and 2025 years was conducted. The inclusion criteria for this study consisted of cases seeking primary rhinoplasty; cases of secondary rhinoplasty and severe trauma were excluded from consideration. The measurements were meticulously performed on lateral views of the CT scans. Key points identified included the nasion, sellion, dorsal profile angle (hereinafter referred to as the gibbion point), kyphion, and rhinion points. The dorsal profile angle, nasofrontal angle (NFA), nasion angle (NA), and kyphion angle (KA) were calculated, along with measurements of nasal bone length and shape. Thus, S- and V-shape nasal bone anthropometrics were detected, and the correlations between all measurements were evaluated.

resultsThe mean age was 35.4 ± 12.7 years. Of the cases, 501 were female, and the remaining were male. Seven hundred sixteen cases had an S-shaped nasal bone. In contrast, 306 had a V-shape. The DPA, NFA, and KA were 153.5 ± 10.7°, 125.7 ± 7.1°, and 160.7 ± 6.5° in the S-shape group, while they measured 157.5 ± 7.3°, 128.5 ± 10.6°, and 167 ± 7.3° in the V-shape group, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the measurements (p = 0.001). A low-level but positive correlation was found between the DPA with kyphion and nasofrontal angles.

conclusionsThe pivot point of the dorsal profile angle represents the origin of a prominent hump. This angle is more distinct in males and noses characterized by S-shaped nasal bones. Therefore, surgeons are advised to consider DPA when executing preservation rhinoplasty, as alterations to this angle may transform the nasal framework from an S-shape to a V-shape. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalNasal BoneRhinoplastyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAnthropometryEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTurkeyYoung AdultAnthropometricsDorsal profile angleGibbion pointNasal angles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.