ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Nasal Bone Anthropometric Analysis of 1022 Adult Turkish Patients Utilizing Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography: The Dorsal Profile Angle and Its Clinical Implications.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative anthropometric assessment of nasal aesthetic parameters in iranian rhinoplasty candidates: deviation from conventional normative standards.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Is there Any Correlation Between Nasal Height and Facial-Nasal Horizontal Anthropometrics? An Anthropometric Analysis Using Three-Dimensional CT.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnthropometric analysis of the nasal bone can establish parameters that significantly contribute to rhinoplasty outcomes. Key anatomical landmarks situated along the nasal dorsum, including the sellion, rhinion, and kyphion, can have significant angular relationships. Among these elements, the dorsal profile angle (DPA) and its corresponding point have been the least investigated to date. MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive review of nasal bone anthropometrics using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images from 1022 randomly selected adult Turkish patients who applied for rhinoplasty at our clinic between 2022 and 2025 years was conducted. The inclusion criteria for this study consisted of cases seeking primary rhinoplasty; cases of secondary rhinoplasty and severe trauma were excluded from consideration. The measurements were meticulously performed on lateral views of the CT scans. Key points identified included the nasion, sellion, dorsal profile angle (hereinafter referred to as the gibbion point), kyphion, and rhinion points. The dorsal profile angle, nasofrontal angle (NFA), nasion angle (NA), and kyphion angle (KA) were calculated, along with measurements of nasal bone length and shape. Thus, S- and V-shape nasal bone anthropometrics were detected, and the correlations between all measurements were evaluated.
resultsThe mean age was 35.4 ± 12.7 years. Of the cases, 501 were female, and the remaining were male. Seven hundred sixteen cases had an S-shaped nasal bone. In contrast, 306 had a V-shape. The DPA, NFA, and KA were 153.5 ± 10.7°, 125.7 ± 7.1°, and 160.7 ± 6.5° in the S-shape group, while they measured 157.5 ± 7.3°, 128.5 ± 10.6°, and 167 ± 7.3° in the V-shape group, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the measurements (p = 0.001). A low-level but positive correlation was found between the DPA with kyphion and nasofrontal angles.
conclusionsThe pivot point of the dorsal profile angle represents the origin of a prominent hump. This angle is more distinct in males and noses characterized by S-shaped nasal bones. Therefore, surgeons are advised to consider DPA when executing preservation rhinoplasty, as alterations to this angle may transform the nasal framework from an S-shape to a V-shape. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40855023What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.