ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
The enhanced pathological response from additional immunotherapy improved recurrence-free survival for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center cohort study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Prospective Multicenter Comparative Cohort Study of Neoadjuvant Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy and Chemoradiotherapy in Resectable Clinical Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Observational
- Effectiveness comparison of pembrolizumab versus other immune checkpoint inhibitors in neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmunotherapy shows promise in enhancing pathological responses in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC), but its long-term survival benefits remain uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the impact of adding immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) on survival in ESCC patients.
methodsFrom five medical centers, 273 ESCC patients were studied, receiving either neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nICT) or nCT. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint, with locoregional recurrence-free survival (L-RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (D-MFS) as secondary endpoints. To address confounding biases, propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were utilized. An 18-month landmark analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves assessed survival differences.
resultsThe pathological response was significantly improved in the nICT group compared to the nCT group. Cox analysis confirmed nICT as an independent factor associated with better prognosis (HR = 3.05, 95% CI 1.81-5.14, p < 0.001). Before matching, the nICT group showed superior RFS (p < 0.001), L-RFS (p = 0.002), and D-MFS (p < 0.001). After PSM, nICT showed its advantage in RFS (p < 0.001) and D-MFS (p = 0.003), with a trend toward improved L-RFS (p = 0.075). Similarly, after IPTW, nICT maintained its survival benefit in RFS (p = 0.001), D-MFS (p = 0.015), with an observed trend toward enhanced L-RFS (p = 0.085). Stratified analyses revealed greater survival benefits of nICT in patients with ypStage III/IV (p < 0.001). The 18-month landmark analysis demonstrated that nICT significantly enhanced RFS (p < 0.001), L-RFS (p = 0.048), and D-MFS (p < 0.001) with the first 18 months after surgery.
conclusionnICT substantially improves prognostic outcomes in LA-ESCC patients, especially in terms of D-MFS and the period of the first 18-month post-surgery, suggesting nICT could be a more effective treatment strategy. Besides, more prospective investigations are required to substantiate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40854998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.