ArticleScientific reports2025
Predictors of one-year clinically driven revascularization following endovascular treatment of isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions (IAPAL) commonly require interventional treatment. This study aimed to develop a prediction model using procedure-related variables for one-year clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CDTLR) events after intervention. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from 217 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions between 2017 and 2022. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, all patients were randomly divided into training and testing sets at a ratio of 7:3. In the training set, LASSO regression, logistic regression, and random forest were used to identify the most significant variables for outcome events. These variables were then incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression model. The prediction model was visualized using a nomogram and validated using training and testing sets. The final nomogram consisted of three independent predictors: body weight, drug-coating balloon angioplasty, and post-procedural outflow score. The regression equation was: Y = 3.65–0.0645×weight − 1.04×(DCB = use) − 1.21×(post-procedural outflow score = 2) − 0.465×(post-procedural outflow score = 3). The prediction model demonstrated C-indices of 0.756 and 0.689 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration curves showed satisfactory agreement in both cohorts. The prediction model incorporating body weight, drug-coating balloon angioplasty, and post-procedural outflow score may assist in predicting one-year clinically driven target lesion revascularization in patients with isolated atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions, providing valuable information for individualized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.