ArticleScientific reports2025
Fermentability coefficient of tropical forages and fermentative profile and in vitro degradability of silages.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our objective was to determine the fermentability coefficient (FC) of different tropical forages and the fermentative profile, chemical composition, and in vitro degradability of their silages. A randomised block design was used, with five treatments and four repetitions. The forage species studied were whole-plant maize (Zea mays), Cenchrus purpureus cv. BRS Capiaçu, Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã, U. decumbens cv. Basilisk, and Megathyrsus maximus cv. BRS Zuri. The FC was highest (P < 0.001) in whole-plant maize, followed by BRS Capiaçu, and lowest for BRS Piatã, Basilisk, and BRS Zuri. The fibrous fraction of the plant was higher (P < 0.001) for BRS Capiaçu and lower for whole-plant maize. The pH and ammonia content were lower (P < 0.001) for maize and BRS Capiaçu silages, and higher for BRS Zuri silage. Maize silage showed the highest effective DM digestibility (P < 0.001). The BRS Capiaçu silage exhibited a higher (P = 0.009) indigestible NDF fraction. In conclusion, if whole-plant maize cannot be produced for silage, ensiling perennial grasses, such as BRS Capiaçu, BRS Piatã, and Basilisk, is recommended due to their higher ensilability compared to BRS Zuri.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.