ArticleScientific reports2025
Survival prediction models for people living with HIV based on four machine learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although antiretroviral therapy has prolonged the lifespan of people living with HIV, significant variations still exist in survival rates and risk factors among these people. This study compares the performance of the Cox proportional hazard models with four machine learning models in predicting the survival of people living with HIV, analyzing the survival factors among them, thereby assisting medical decision-making. We collected data on 676 people living with HIV from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Significant variables (p < 0.05) were identified using Cox univariate analysis. Using a random number method, the data were split into a training set (473 cases) and a test set (203 cases) in a 7:3 ratio. We employed the Cox proportional hazard model and four classification machine learning models, including eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Multilayer Perceptron, to develop survival prediction models for people living with HIV. The predictive performance of these models was evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration curves, and the best model was selected based on these metrics. The average age of diagnosis among the sample participants was 56.63 years (SD = 17.53). Considering the performance of both the training and testing cohorts, the Random Forest classifier emerged as the model with the best predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.912, an Accuracy of 0.862, a Precision of 0.794, a Recall of 0.562, and an F1 score of 0.659. Random Forest was followed by the Support Vector Machine, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Multilayer Perceptron, and the Cox proportional hazard model performed similarly. The predictive performance of machine learning models surpasses traditional Cox proportional hazard models. In China, the Random Forest model can be considered for analyzing and predicting the survival rates of people living with HIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.