Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40854934›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Insect applications to open wounds by chimpanzees in the wild: first insights from East African chimpanzees.

Kayla Kolff, Daniela Acosta Flórez, Alessandra Mascaro, Simone Pika

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kayla KolffComparative BioCognition, Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany. kkolff@uni-osnabrueck.de.
Daniela Acosta FlórezDepartment of Anthropology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Yale university, New Haven, United States of America.
Alessandra MascaroComparative BioCognition, Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Simone PikaComparative BioCognition, Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicative behaviours are widespread among animals, and chimpanzees in the wild may exhibit a newly identified form involving the application of insects to open wounds. To date, insect applications to wounds have only been reported in a single community of Central chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes troglodytes). Thus, we report observations of similar behaviours in Eastern chimpanzees (P. t. schweinfurthii) of the Ngogo chimpanzee population, in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Between November 2021 and July 2022, we observed six individuals (three males, three females) applying flying insects to their own wounds (N = 5) and, in one instance, to the wound of a conspecific. These observations demonstrate a generally consistent sequential pattern of insect applications in both Eastern and Central chimpanzees. Although the extent and potential medicinal function of this behaviour remain unclear, we propose three hypotheses to inform future research, focusing on insect selectivity, social transmission, and prosociality. In conclusion, the findings suggest that insect applications are more widespread than currently documented, and provide a basis for investigating their acquisition, social dynamics, and potential relevance to the evolution of human medicinal behaviours.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalInsectaPan troglodytesWounds and InjuriesAnimalsFemaleMaleUgandaAnimal medicationEntomotherapyOther-regarding carePan troglodytes schweinfurthiiProsocial behaviourSelf-medication

Identifiers

PMID40854934
PMCPMC12379220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.