ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating the role of molecular coating in human corneal endothelial cell primary culture using artificial intelligence-driven image analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Porcine Corneal Models as Translational Platforms for Innovative Therapies: Current Insights and Future Directions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The monolayer of approximately 300,000 human corneal endothelial cells (hCECs) on the posterior surface of the cornea is essential to maintain transparency but is non-self-regenerative. Corneal blindness can currently only be treated by corneal transplantation, hindered by a global donor shortage, highlighting the need for developing tissue and/or cell therapy. The mass production of these advanced therapy medicinal products requires obtaining high-yield, high-quality endothelial cell cultures characterized by hexagonal shape, low size variability, and high endothelial cell density (ECD). Among the usual critical quality attributes which combine the expression of differentiation markers, ECD and cell morphological parameters, the latter are not optimally measured in vitro by conventional image analysis which poorly recognizes adherent cultured cells. We developed a high-performance automated segmentation using Cellpose algorithm and an original analysis method, improving the calculation of classical morphological parameters (coefficient of variation of cell area and hexagonality) and introducing new parameters specific to hCECs culture in vitro. Considering the importance of the extracellular matrix in vivo, and the panel of molecules available for coating cell culture plastics, we used these new tools to perform a comprehensive comparison of 13 molecules (laminins and collagens). We demonstrated their ability to discriminate subtle differences between cultures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.