ArticleNature communications2025
Large protein databases reveal structural complementarity and functional locality.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Replication-transcription collisions impose DNA strand-specific constraints on gene length in bacteria.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Moving from a taxonomic to a functional perspective in global microbiome analysis requires optimizing multiplexing ratios.mSystems · 2026Article
- How far can you go? Extrapolating values of catalytic activity from known protein landscapes in natural and directed evolution.Chemical Society reviews · 2026Review
- Comprehensive annotation and analysis of human microproteins by human microprotein atlas platform.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent breakthroughs in protein structure prediction have led to a surge in high-quality 3D models, highlighting the need for efficient computational solutions. In our work, we examine the structural clusters from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (AFDB), a high-quality subset of ESMAtlas, and the Microbiome Immunity Project (MIP). We create a single cohesive low-dimensional representation of the resulting protein space. We show that, while each database occupies distinct regions, they collectively exhibit significant overlap in their functional profiles. High-level biological functions tend to cluster in particular regions, revealing a shared functional landscape despite the diverse sources of data. By creating a representation of protein structure space, localizing functional annotations within this space, and providing an open-access web-server for exploration, this work offers insights for future research concerning protein sequence-structure-function relationships, enabling biological questions to be asked about taxonomic assignments, environmental factors, or functional specificity. This approach is generalizable, thus enabling further discovery beyond findings presented here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.