Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40854900›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Full Field Digital Mammography Dataset from a Population Screening Program.

Edward Kendall, Parham Hajishafiezahramini, Matthew Hamilton, Gregory Doyle, Nancy Wadden, Oscar Meruvia-Pastor

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edward KendallFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Parham HajishafiezahraminiDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Matthew HamiltonDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada. mhamilton@mun.ca.
Gregory DoyleCancer Care, Newfoundland and Labrador Health Services, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Nancy WaddenFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Oscar Meruvia-PastorDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.

Funding

Memorial University of Newfoundland (MUN) Seed, Bridge, Multidiciplinary Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer presents the second largest cancer risk in the world to women. Early detection of cancer has been shown to be effective in reducing mortality. Population screening programs schedule regular mammography imaging for participants, promoting early detection. Currently, such screening programs require manual reading. False-positive errors in the reading process unnecessarily leads to costly follow-up and patient anxiety. Automated methods promise to provide more efficient, consistent and effective reading. To facilitate their development, a number of datasets have been created. Such datasets can aid in learning-based development but many are not publicly available and do not draw directly from population screening programs. With the aim of specifically targeting population screening programs, we introduce NL-Breast-Screening, a dataset from a Canadian provincial screening program. The dataset consists of 5997 mammography exams, each of which has four standard views and is biopsy-confirmed. Cases where radiologists' reading was a false-positive are identified. NL-Breast-Screening is made publicly available as a new resource to promote advances in automation for population screening programs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMammographyCanadaFemaleHumansMass Screening

Identifiers

PMID40854900
PMCPMC12378999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.