ArticleBMJ open2025
Development of thoracic spine kyphosis and lumbar spine lordosis in the growing child from birth to adulthood: protocol for a systematic review.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Surface Topography for the Assessment of Spinal Alignment: A Cross-Sectional Study of Biomechanical Correlates.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThoracic kyphosis, a posterior curvature of the thoracic spine and lumbar lordosis, an anterior curvature of the lumbar spine, are essential components of spinal alignment that facilitate a biomechanically efficient upright stance. Understanding the normal growth of the spine and its constituents, especially during periods of rapid growth, is important as deviations from normal growth are thought to be initiating factors of spinal conditions such as scoliosis. While in the coronal plane the spine is straight, there is variability in the reported normative values of sagittal spinal shape, reported in the paediatric population. This variability may well represent the range of normality allowing for population differences of ethnicity and sex, but could also be attributed to differing imaging techniques and measurement methods. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the normative values for thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis between birth and adulthood. The review's findings should enhance the understanding of the development of the spine and aid in establishing the range that results from differences in techniques of measurement and imaging modalities used. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review protocol is reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. Inclusion criteria are participants aged 18 years or less without pain or spinal pathology, such as scoliosis, any spinal or thoracic surgery and any other medical conditions that could affect spinal growth and development. The review will consider studies reporting serial quantitative measurements of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. Inclusion will be limited to studies published in English. The PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases will be searched. Following Cochrane guidance, a dual reviewer system will be used where both reviewers will screen 20% of titles and abstracts to confirm concordance, and then one reviewer will screen the remaining articles. During full-text screening, one reviewer will review all the full-text articles while the second reviewer will review all the articles excluded by the first reviewer, with a third reviewer being involved to resolve any discrepancies. A risk of bias assessment will be performed on the identified studies. The data extracted will be analysed through meta-analysis if it proves feasible, synthesising continuous data such as the size of the kyphosis and lordosis, with further subcategorisation by sex and ethnicity as appropriate. Correlation coefficients will be used to analyse relationships between variables, and I ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this study as no original data will be collected. The findings will be disseminated to academic audiences through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024502782.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.