Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40854819›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025

Where does ISAC (immune-stimulating antibody conjugates) go from here?

Chen Fu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chen FuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China cfu@cmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2343-1802

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune-stimulating antibody conjugates (ISACs) have emerged as a promising class of therapeutics, employing design principles similar to antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) but replacing cytotoxic payloads with immune-stimulatory agents. These agents enhance immune system activation, enabling more effective tumor targeting and elimination. However, recent clinical setbacks since 2021 have raised concerns about ISACs' viability as ADC successors. Although ISAC development remains early-stage, clinical trials have revealed significant challenges, including limited efficacy, systemic toxicity (eg, cytokine release syndrome), and anti-drug antibody generation. Current strategies to overcome these hurdles focus on optimizing payload selection (eg, toll-like receptor 7(TLR7) vs stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonists), improving linker stability, and exploring localized delivery methods. While ISACs face substantial translational barriers, their potential to synergize with existing immunotherapies and treat "cold" tumors maintains therapeutic promise. Further refinement of design parameters may ultimately position ISACs as a transformative oncology modality.

Indexed as

ImmunoconjugatesImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansImmunoconjugatesAntibody-drug conjugates - ADCImmune modulatoryImmunotherapyTumor microenvironment - TME

Identifiers

PMID40854819
PMCPMC12382550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.