Trial reportBMJ global health2025
Factors associated with fluoxetine adherence among outpatients with common mental disorders in Western Kenya.
Trial report in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03466346 (A Sequential, Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Sequential, Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) for Non-specialist Treatment of Common Mental Disorders in Kenya: Leveraging the Depression And Primary-care Partnership for Effectiveness-implementation Research (DAPPER) Project
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveNon-adherence to antidepressants has been linked to increased symptom severity, relapse and hospitalisation from common mental disorders. However, there is limited knowledge of factors associated with antidepressant adherence in low-income and middle-income countries, especially in public sector, primary care settings.
methodsWe quantified fluoxetine adherence using the medication possession ratio. A limitation of this measure is that it does not always reflect the ingestion of medication. We constructed a generalised estimating equations linear regression with robust SEs, clustered by the participant, to identify independent predictors of fluoxetine adherence.
resultsParticipants randomised to fluoxetine were dispensed an average of 126 daily doses, or 70% of the 180 possible doses. Adherence was higher in the first half of the treatment period at 86.3%, 95% CI (83.5% to 89.2%) compared with 46.5% in the second half (44.3% to 48.8%) (p<0.001). Participants who opted for community-delivered fluoxetine demonstrated adherence at 79.7% (77.0% to 82.4%) compared with 58.6% (55.7% to 61.5%) of those who only picked up medication at the facility (p<0.001). Use of mHealth for at least one but less than half of the visits had the highest level of adherence at 84.6% (82.4% to 86.9%) compared with 49.6% (46.1% to 53.0%) among those who did not use mHealth and 67.2% (62.5% to 72.0%) for those who used mHealth at least half their visits (p<0.001).
conclusionsAdherence to fluoxetine was high relative to existing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors adherence data, the majority of which is from high-income countries. Adherence was higher during the first half of treatment. People who were older, living with HIV and opted to use community delivery of medication and/or mHealth had higher adherence. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03466346.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.