Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40854805›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open respiratory research2025

Enhanced detection of patients with previous COVID-19: superiority of the double diffusion technique.

Gerald Stanley Zavorsky, Giovanni Barisione, Thomas Gille, Roberto W Dal Negro, Marta Núñez-Fernández, Leigh Seccombe, Gianluca Imeri, Fabiano Di Marco, Jann Mortensen, Elisabetta Salvioni and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gerald Stanley ZavorskyDepartment of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA gszavorsky@health.ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4473-1601
Giovanni BarisioneIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2349-5646
Thomas GillePhysiologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles, GHUPSSD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1577-6595
Roberto W Dal NegroNational Center for Respiratory Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology, CESFAR, Verona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-0732
Marta Núñez-FernándezDepartment of Pneumonology, University Hospital Complex of Vigo, VIgo, Pontevedra, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9088-3713
Leigh SeccombeThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8037-3824
Gianluca ImeriDepartment of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Bergamo, Lombardy, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1139-6509
Fabiano Di MarcoDepartment of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Bergamo, Lombardy, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1743-0504
Jann MortensenDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Copenhagen - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1399-8995
Elisabetta SalvioniCentro Cardiologico Monzino Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Lombardy, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8448-7551
Piergiuseppe AgostoniCentro Cardiologico Monzino Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Lombardy, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8345-6382
Vito BrusascoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8948-0896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent pulmonary dysfunction is common after COVID-19, yet traditional assessments using carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) alone may miss alveolar-capillary impairment.

objectiveTo determine whether combining nitric oxide (DLNO DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis using hierarchical mixed-effects modelling. The dataset included 572 COVID-19 survivors and 72 matched controls from six European centres. Lung function metrics-including spirometry, total lung capacity, DLNO

resultsThe number of days between SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and testing did not affect any of the measured z-scores. Summed DLNO

conclusionSummed DLNO

Indexed as

COVID-19Pulmonary Diffusing CapacityAdultAgedCarbon MonoxideDyspneaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNitric OxideSARS-CoV-2Carbon MonoxideNitric OxideCOVID-19Respiratory Function TestRespiratory Measurement

Identifiers

PMID40854805
PMCPMC12382503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.