ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM2025
Evaluating the Impact of an eConsult Platform on Specialty Care Access for Medicaid Patients.
Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The 4Cs of Primary Care, Leveraging Artificial Intelligence, and Improving Clinical Practice.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare access disparities persist, particularly among Medicaid patients in regions like the Inland Empire, California. These patients often face prolonged wait times for primary and specialty care, compounded by difficulties in scheduling with providers. Leveraging eConsult platforms offers a potential solution to improve specialist care accessibility. This study examines the impact of the Inland Empire Health Plan's (IEHP) eConsult services on enhancing interactions between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialists and improving patient care.
methodsWe analyzed 2,505 eConsults conducted between January and June 2022 within the IEHP, focusing on dermatology, pulmonology, and urology. Each eConsult was categorized based on closure outcomes, advice provided, and authorization status. We cross-referenced eConsult data with claims and authorization records to determine encounter completion, particularly whether a face-to-face specialist visit occurred.
resultsOnly a fraction of eConsults (27% dermatology, 25% pulmonology, 37% urology) resulted in specialist advice. In cases where eConsults did not suffice, specialists recommended in-person follow-up; however, a significant portion of patients (57% dermatology, 71% pulmonology, 53% urology) did not receive in-person specialty care.
conclusionThis study highlights the potential of eConsults in improving specialty care access for Medicaid patients in underserved regions. While eConsults show promise in expediting specialist access, challenges such as varying PCP utilization and the need for in-person visits persist. Addressing these issues with standardized protocols and better triaging can significantly reduce healthcare disparities and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.