Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40854639›Full record

ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2025

Gut microbiome composition and diversity of wild-caught and hatchery-bred milkfish (Chanos chanos) fry.

Gardel Xyza L Silvederio, Therese F Javellana, Ande Bryle N Genciana, Maria Alexandra G Fontanilla, Rex Ferdinand M Traifalgar, Fredson H Huervana, Carmelo S Del Castillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gut-Derived Lactic Acid Bacteria,International journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gardel Xyza L SilvederioInstitute of Fish Processing Technology, College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, Region, VI 5023, Philippines. Electronic address: gslibunao@up.edu.ph.
Therese F JavellanaInstitute of Aquaculture, College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, Region, VI 5023, Philippines.
Ande Bryle N GencianaInstitute of Aquaculture, College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, Region, VI 5023, Philippines.
Maria Alexandra G FontanillaInstitute of Aquaculture, College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, Region, VI 5023, Philippines.
Rex Ferdinand M TraifalgarInstitute of Aquaculture, College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, Region, VI 5023, Philippines.
Fredson H HuervanaInstitute of Aquaculture, College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, Region, VI 5023, Philippines.
Carmelo S Del CastilloInstitute of Aquaculture, College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, Region, VI 5023, Philippines; National Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of the Philippines Visayas, Region, VI 5023, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Milkfish is the most produced finfish in the Philippines, with approximately 75 % of its fry sourced from hatcheries. Despite numerous studies on gut microbiota of wild and cultured fish species, the diversity and functional roles of the milkfish fry gut microbiome remain poorly understood. This study presents the first gut microbiome profiles of wild and hatchery-bred milkfish fry using 16S rRNA amplicon analysis. A total of 437 OTUs were recovered and significant differences in gut bacterial communities among fry from different sources was observed, indicating that habitat is a key determinant of gut microbiome diversity. The core gut microbiota analysis identified Vibrionaceae and Roseobacteraceae as the most common and abundant bacterial families across fry sources. However, Paenibacillaceae and Bacillaceae under Phylum Bacillota were dominant in wild fry sources, particularly Hamtic and Kirayan, whereas families belonging to Phyla Cyanobacteriota, and Thermodesulfobacteria were more prevalent in Dumagas and Kirayan hatchery fry sources. Functional predictions of the gut bacterial microbiome revealed 26 differentially abundant pathways between wild-caught and hatchery-bred fry, including those related to metabolism, organismal systems, cellular processes, environmental and genetic information processing. These findings highlight significant variations in gut microbiome composition, diversity, and functional potential across different sources of wild-caught and hatchery-bred fry. Understanding these source-specific microbial communities could provide insight into the development of interventions that can improve gut health and enhance milkfish hatchery practices. It can also generate information on ideal fry selection across local milkfish sources that will enhance larval productivity and survival in the succeeding nursery and grow-out culture stages.

Indexed as

Gut microbiomeHatchery-bredMetagenomeMicrobial diversityMilkfish fryWild-caught

Identifiers

PMID40854639
PMCPMC12197973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.