Trial reportJournal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry2025
Let's kick that habit: An experiment of five habit-change strategies on habits and symptoms among adults with sleep problems.
Trial report in Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Maximizing benefits from evidence-based psychological treatments: Memory support and habit formation as key strategies.Behaviour research and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Habits are underexplored in research on evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs). We recruited participants (N = 286) with sleep problems via Mechanical Turk for an experiment to shift wake-up habits, a key target of EBPTs for sleep problems. Participants were randomly assigned to a control (i.e., psychoeducation about healthy wake-up habits) or one of five active habit-change strategies: substitution with RISE UP, awareness training, vigilant monitoring, implementation intentions, and values. New and old wake-up habit strength, sleep disruption, and sleep-related impairment were assessed at baseline, six-week follow-up, and three-month follow-up. Aim 1 tested within- and between-condition change in the outcomes. Aim 2 tested whether change in wake-up habit strength predicted improvements in sleep disruption and sleep-related impairment. Except the values condition, all habit-change strategies and the control were significantly associated with within-condition improvements at 6-week follow-up and 3-month follow-up in: new habit strength (d = 0.81 to 1.68), old habit strength (d = -0.63 to -1.04), sleep disruption (d = -0.97 to -1.98), and sleep-related impairment (d = -0.60 to -1.65). Few differences between conditions emerged. Across conditions, more than 50% of participants met thresholds for clinically meaningful improvement, except the values condition at 3-month follow-up. Change in new and old habit strength significantly predicted change in sleep problems. Key limitations included: an exclusively online study design, dropout rate, and sample collected via Mechanical Turk using self-report measures without formal assessment of sleep diagnoses. Future research should investigate the clinical presentations and EBPT skills for which these habit-change strategies are most effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.