Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40854587›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical research2026

Cervical cancer perceived behavioral risk factors using logistic regression technique.

I M Elzein, Ashraf Chamseddine, Ahmad Eltanboly, Adam Elzein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

I M ElzeinDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha 24449, Qatar.
Ashraf ChamseddineDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha 24449, Qatar.
Ahmad EltanbolyFaculty of Science, Galala University, New Galala City, Suez Governorate 43111, Egypt.
Adam ElzeinDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz 90-419, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer represents a considerable global health challenge, mainly because of ineffective screening programs in low-income countries. The current study aimed to forecast cervical cancer incidence by analyzing behavioral risk factors through logistic regression, employing feature engineering techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA). PCA successfully condensed the dataset into ten principal components, capturing 89% of the variance, while stratified K-fold cross-validation ensured a balanced representation of classes. With the application of L1 regularization, the logistic regression model achieved an accuracy of 97.2%, an area under the curve (AUC) of 98.1%, an F1 score of 97.2%, a specificity of 96.1%, and a log loss of 0.17. The performance of the models was comparatively evaluated, and the results revealed that the logistic regression model achieved the highest accuracy of 97.2% compared with decision trees at 93.33%, random forest at 93.33%, XGBoost at 93.33%, naive Bayes at 91.67%, and non-regularized logistic regression at 87.55%. This research underscores the importance of early prediction of cervical cancer based on behavioral risk factors and suggests a robust, easily implementable workflow to improve classification accuracy. Future research should concentrate on refining these predictive tools to overcome social and behavioral barriers to prevention, particularly within underserved populations.

Indexed as

behavioral risk factorscervical cancerfeature engineeringlogistic regressionprincipal component analysisregularization

Identifiers

PMID40854587
PMCPMC13231354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.