ArticleJournal of biomedical research2026
Cervical cancer perceived behavioral risk factors using logistic regression technique.
Article in Journal of biomedical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial commentary on the special section on cancer research.Journal of biomedical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer represents a considerable global health challenge, mainly because of ineffective screening programs in low-income countries. The current study aimed to forecast cervical cancer incidence by analyzing behavioral risk factors through logistic regression, employing feature engineering techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA). PCA successfully condensed the dataset into ten principal components, capturing 89% of the variance, while stratified K-fold cross-validation ensured a balanced representation of classes. With the application of L1 regularization, the logistic regression model achieved an accuracy of 97.2%, an area under the curve (AUC) of 98.1%, an F1 score of 97.2%, a specificity of 96.1%, and a log loss of 0.17. The performance of the models was comparatively evaluated, and the results revealed that the logistic regression model achieved the highest accuracy of 97.2% compared with decision trees at 93.33%, random forest at 93.33%, XGBoost at 93.33%, naive Bayes at 91.67%, and non-regularized logistic regression at 87.55%. This research underscores the importance of early prediction of cervical cancer based on behavioral risk factors and suggests a robust, easily implementable workflow to improve classification accuracy. Future research should concentrate on refining these predictive tools to overcome social and behavioral barriers to prevention, particularly within underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.