ArticleCancer science2025
Cystathionine as a Potential Urinary Marker for Diagnosing and Assessing Pretreatment Risk in Neuroblastoma.
Article in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urinary homovanillic acid (HVA) and vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) are widely used diagnostic markers for neuroblastoma, but urinary markers for risk assessment prior to invasive biopsy are lacking. We hypothesized that cystathionine (CTN) may be a new neuroblastoma biomarker and evaluated its utility for diagnosis and pretreatment risk assessment. 80 participants provided 202 urine samples: 32 from 32 control participants, 29 from 29 patients with primary neuroblastoma, and 141 from 30 patients with residual tumors, 11 of whom had primary neuroblastoma. Urinary CTN and HVA/VMA concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic and pretreatment risk assessment performance according to the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) pretreatment risk classification and the revised 2021 Children's Oncology Group (COG) neuroblastoma risk classification. Associations with prognostic factors were also evaluated. The AUC values for diagnosis were 0.920, 0.903, and 0.946 for HVA, VMA, and CTN, respectively. For pretreatment risk assessment (high-risk versus intermediate- and low-risk, and high- and intermediate-risk versus low-risk) the AUCs according to the INRG classification were 0.576 and 0.578 for HVA, 0.524 and 0.513 for VMA, and 0.852 and 0.708 for CTN, respectively, whereas they were 0.530 and 0.741 for HVA, 0.510 and 0.796 for VMA, and 0.758 and 0.981 for CTN, respectively, according to the COG classification. The values for MYCN status were 0.844 for HVA, 0.844 for VMA, and 0.942 for CTN. CTN may be a useful urinary marker for neuroblastoma diagnosis and pretreatment risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.