ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Distal and proximal embolization for penetrating vertebral artery injury: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhen treating a penetrating vertebral artery (VA) injury, blindly removing a foreign object that has pierced the artery can lead to distal embolism due to thrombus formation at the penetration site and uncontrollable hemorrhage during foreign object removal. OBSERVATIONS: A 68-year-old man was impaled in the posterior neck by a 7-cm metal rod during brush cutting. Neither neurological deficits nor active bleeding was observed. CT revealed that the metal rod had penetrated between the left C1 and C2 transverse foramina, and CT angiography showed occlusion at the V2 segment of the left VA. Retrograde distal embolization via a contralateral approach was performed, followed by proximal embolization to achieve complete occlusion before rod removal. No arterial bleeding occurred during rod removal. Postoperative MRI revealed a small infarct in the left cerebellum, but no neurological deficits were present. LESSONS: In cases of penetrating VA injury with a retained foreign object, vascular evaluation and embolization should be considered before foreign object removal. Retrograde distal embolization via a contralateral approach, combined with proximal embolization, may be an effective strategy for preventing distal embolism and controlling hemorrhage. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25435.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.