Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40854092›Full record

ArticleJMIR diabetes2025

Assessing the Clinical Feasibility of the DiaFocus System for Integrated Personalized Management of Type 2 Diabetes: 6-Month Pilot Cohort Study.

Nanna Lind, Per Bækgaard, Jakob E Bardram, Claus Cramer-Petersen, Kirsten Nørgaard, Merete B Christensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nanna LindCopenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 83, Herlev, 2730, Denmark, 45 28711435.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8599-6868
Per BækgaardDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6720-1128
Jakob E BardramDepartment of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1390-8758
Claus Cramer-PetersenColoplast A/S, Humlebaek, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0788-0031
Kirsten NørgaardCopenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 83, Herlev, 2730, Denmark, 45 28711435.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1620-8271
Merete B ChristensenCopenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 83, Herlev, 2730, Denmark, 45 28711435.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0095-5427

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a complex, chronic condition that requires ongoing management. An important aspect of effective diabetes management is shared decision-making between the person with diabetes and the health care professionals (HCPs) to tailor individual treatment plans. Personal health technologies can play a crucial role in this collaborative effort by providing tools for monitoring, communication, and education. Objective: This study aims to test the clinical feasibility of DiaFocus, a mobile health system developed for adults with T2D. Methods: This was a single-arm, prospective, 6-month pilot study in a clinical outpatient setting at Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Denmark. The DiaFocus system includes an app for the participants and a web portal for the HCPs. The system collects diabetes-related data, including participant-reported lifestyle surveys, sensor-based measures on physical activity, and participant-selected focus areas, aiming to support communication and shared decision-making at clinical visits. Participants were eligible if they were ≥18 years old, diagnosed with T2D≥12 months, spoke Danish, and had a smartphone (iOS 13+ or Android 8.0+). For each participant, 3 visits and 1 telephone call were scheduled during the 6-month study period. The DiaFocus system's acceptability and feasibility were assessed through retention rates, app usage, participant feedback, and by the CACHET Unified Method for Assessment of Clinical Feasibility (CUMACF) questionnaire. The clinical outcomes were assessed by the following questionnaires: Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), Perceived Competence for Diabetes (PCDS), Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs+c), hemoglobin A1c levels, and body weight. Results: A total of 17 participants with T2D were included in the study, 15 completed the study, and data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The median age was 68 (IQR 56-72) years, 12 (71%) were males, the median diabetes duration was 18 (IQR 11-21) years, and the median hemoglobin A1c was 59 (IQR 49-68) mmol/mol. Participants found the DiaFocus system feasible to support diabetes management despite technical problems, and they valued the ability to set focus areas. The most common focus areas were "blood glucose" (n=10, 59%) and "exercise" (n=9, 53%), but areas such as "sleep" and "mood" were also used. The CUMACF questionnaire showed that 90% (9/10) of the participants had very favorable views of how easy the system is to understand, learn, and use, and 80% (8/10) of the participants agreed or strongly agreed that the system was useful. Feedback was generally positive, indicating participants would use a refined version. Despite these findings, no statistically significant changes in clinical outcomes were observed throughout the study period using the DiaFocus system. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated that the DiaFocus system is clinically feasible and acceptable for users with T2D, although there is a need for optimization of app functionality and stability.

Indexed as

adultchronic conditioncommunicationDenmarkdiabetes managementdiabetes mellitusdiabetes treatmentdietdigital health systemdigital platformexercisefeasibilitymedicationmHealthmobile healthmonitoringpilot studyshared decision-makingsmokingstabilitytype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID40854092
PMCPMC12377514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.