ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025
Tongue Image-Based Diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Tract Infection Using Machine Learning: Algorithm Development and Validation.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 3-Tier AI Model for COVID-19 Triage Using Pharyngeal Images: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Development of a cold-heat syndrome classification model for children with allergic rhinitis based on multimodal data.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Human adenoviruses (HAdVs) and COVID-19 are prominent respiratory pathogens with overlapping clinical presentations, including fever, cough, and sore throat, posing significant diagnostic challenges without viral testing. Tongue image diagnosis, a noninvasive method used in traditional Chinese medicine, has shown correlations with specific respiratory infections, but its application remains underexplored in differentiating HAdVs from COVID-19. Advances in artificial intelligence offer opportunities to enhance tongue image analysis for more objective and accurate diagnostics. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate artificial intelligence-based predictive models using tongue image features to differentiate COVID-19 from adenoviral respiratory infections, thereby improving diagnostic accuracy and integrating traditional diagnostic methods with modern medical technologies. Methods: A total of 280 tongue images were collected from 58 patients with COVID-19, 84 patients with HAdVs, and 30 healthy controls. Deep learning methods were applied to extract tongue features, including color, coating, fissures, papillae, tooth marks, and granules. Four machine learning classifiers, logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting model, and extreme gradient boosting, were developed to differentiate COVID-19 and HAdV infections. The key features identified by the machine learning algorithms were further visualized in a 2D space. Results: Nine tongue features showed significant differences among groups (all P<.05), including coating color (red, green, and blue), presence of tooth marks, coating crack ratio, moisture level, texture directionality, roughness, and contrast. The extreme gradient boosting model achieved the highest diagnostic performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.90) and an area under the precision-recall curve above 0.70. Shapley additive explanations analysis indicated tongue color, moisture, and texture as key contributors. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate the potential of tongue diagnosis in identifying pathogens responsible for acute respiratory tract infections at the time of admission. This approach holds significant clinical implications, offering the potential to reduce clinician workloads while improving diagnostic accuracy and the overall quality of medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.