Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40854000›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Deep neural networks explain spiking activity in auditory cortex.

Bilal Ahmed, Joshua D Downer, Brian J Malone, Joseph G Makin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bilal AhmedElmore School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Joshua D DownerOtolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Brian J MaloneOtolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Joseph G MakinElmore School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0053-7006

Funding

CRCNS: Identifying principles of auditory cortical organization with machine learningR01DC021600 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Joseph Gerard Makin, MITCHELL L SUTTER · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC021600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For static stimuli or at gross (∼1-s) time scales, artificial neural networks (ANNs) that have been trained on challenging engineering tasks, like image classification and automatic speech recognition, are now the best predictors of neural responses in primate visual and auditory cortex. It is, however, unknown whether this success can be extended to spiking activity at fine time scales, which are particularly relevant to audition. Here we address this question with ANNs trained on speech audio, and acute multi-electrode recordings from the auditory cortex of squirrel monkeys. We show that layers of trained ANNs can predict the spike counts of multi-units responding to speech audio and to monkey vocalizations at bin widths of 50 ms and below. For some multi-units, the ANNs explain close to all of the explainable variance-much more than traditional spectrotemporal receptive fields, and more than untrained networks. Non-primary neurons tend to be more predictable by deeper layers of the ANNs, but there is much variation by neuron, which would be invisible to coarser recording modalities.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexBrainNeural Networks, ComputerSaimiriAnimalsAuditory PathwaysElectrophysiologyNeuronsSpeechSpeech Recognition Software

Identifiers

PMID40854000
PMCPMC12404638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.