ArticlePloS one2025
PiCCL: A lightweight multiview contrastive learning framework for image classification.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce PiCCL (Primary Component Contrastive Learning), a self-supervised contrastive learning framework that utilizes a multiplex Siamese network structure consisting of many identical branches rather than 2 to maximize learning efficiency. PiCCL is simple and light weight, it does not use asymmetric networks, intricate pretext tasks, hard to compute loss functions or multimodal data, which are common for multiview contrastive learning frameworks and could hinder performance, simplicity, generalizability and explainability. PiCCL obtains multiple positive samples by applying the same image augmentation paradigm to the same image numerous times, the network loss is calculated using a custom designed Loss function named PiCLoss (Primary Component Loss) to take advantage of PiCCL's unique structure while keeping it computationally lightweight. To demonstrate its strength, we benchmarked PiCCL against various state-of-the-art self-supervised algorithms on multiple datasets including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and STL-10. PiCCL achieved top performance in most of our tests, with top-1 accuracy of 94%, 72%, and 97% for the 3 datasets respectively. But where PiCCL excels is in the small batch learning scenarios. When testing on STL-10 using a batch size of 8, PiCCL still achieved 93% accuracy, outperforming the competition by about 3 percentage points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.