Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853978›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

The effect of tennis on male bone mineral density: A meta-analysis.

Huang Huiwen, Huang Ju, Fu Dong, Fu Yan, Wang Tao

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huang HuiwenChengdu Physical Education University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9253-3531
Huang JuHope College, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.
Fu DongChengdu Physical Education University, Chengdu, China.
Fu YanSchool of Physical Education, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, China.
Wang TaoSchool of Physical Education (Campus), Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs an asymmetrical sport, tennis positively influences the increase of bone mineral density (BMD) in adolescents. However, most current studies focus on specific body regions, there is a lack of systematic analysis of the impact of tennis on BMD in various parts of the body. Therefore, this study aims to systematically assess the impact of tennis on BMD in different areas of the body.

objectiveThis study aimed to systematically evaluate the effects of tennis on BMD in males.

methodsComprehensive search was conducted across databases including Web of Science, PubMed, CNKI, and Embase to identify high-quality randomized controlled trials examining the effects of tennis on BMD. The search covered literature from database inception to March 2025. Data were screened, extracted, coded, and statistically analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Study selection was based on the PICOS criteria: (i) male tennis players compared to non-tennis players of the same age; (ii) tennis intervention group versus groups engaging in other regular physical activities; (iii) outcome indicators included bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD; and (iv) study design included cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, or controlled experiments.

resultA total of 10 articles involving 761 male participants aged between 10 and 26 were included in the analysis. Tennis intervention was found to significantly improve bone measures in several areas. Specifically, it led to increases in dominant arm BMC (SMD = 0.57 mg/mm, 95% CI [0.01, 1.13], P = 0.04), lumbar spine BMD (MD = 0.10 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.08, 0.11], P < 0.00001), dominant arm and radius BMD (SMD = 1.34 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.49, 2.80], P = 0.002), and right femur BMD (MD = 0.10 g/cm2, 95% CI [0.02, 0.18], P = 0.02). These differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conversely, tennis had no significant effect on whole-body BMC (MD = 25.51 mg/mm, 95% CI [-38.43, 85.35], P = 0.43), non-dominant arm BMC (SMD = 0.03 mg/mm, 95% CI [-0.31, 0.37], P = 0.88), total body BMD (MD = 0.00 g/cm2, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.01], P = 0.97), femoral neck BMD (MD = 0.01 g/cm2, 95% CI [-0.00, 0.01], P = 0.30), or left femur BMD (MD = -0.01 g/cm2, 95% CI [-0.07, 0.05], P = 0.84). These findings were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Additionally, subgroup analyses further revealed that tennis training exerted a targeted impact on BMD. Training durations of more than 7 years and at least 15 hours per week significantly improved BMD in the dominant arm and radius. Additionally, significant improvements in the non-dominant arm and radius BMD were observed in participants with over 2 years of training experience. Enhancement of greater trochanter BMD was closely associated with age of training initiation, with significant improvements noted when training began after age 15. In contrast, tennis had minimal influence on femoral neck BMD.

conclusionTennis effectively enhances BMD in the dominant arm, radius, lumbar spine, greater trochanter, and right lower limb. The effects are asymmetrical, favoring the dominant side. Therefore, to maintain balanced development of BMC and BMD in both limbs, it is recommended to include contralateral (non-dominant side) training during tennis practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/identifier: CRD42023486547. Registration date: March 10, 2025.

Indexed as

Bone DensityTennisAdolescentAdultChildHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40853978
PMCPMC12377574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.