SynthesisPloS one2025
The impact of midwife workload on delivery of care, and mother and baby outcomes in maternity settings in OECD countries: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative blood glucose and energy management in gestational diabetes mellitus: a survey of obstetric staff from selected regions in China.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Work-related quality of life and associated factors among healthcare professionals in public hospitals of Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExcessive midwifery workload is a growing concern that may affect safety and quality of care, with potential consequences for mothers and babies.
aimsTo assess how midwife workload affects delivery of care, and maternal and neonatal outcomes; and whether maternal, neonatal, and staffing factors modify these relationships.
methodsThis systematic review updated a prior review (January 1998 to June 2014) with revisions to search strategies. We searched for new evidence (June 2014 to October 2023) across 11 academic databases (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley); Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley); CINAHL (EBSCOhost); EconLit (EBSCOhost; Embase (Ovid); Epistemonikos; Health Management Information Consortium (Ovid); International HTA Database (INAHTA); Maternity & Infant Care Database (Ovid); Ovid MEDLINE(R); CEA Registry) and 10 grey literature websites. Screening involved multiple reviewers, with 10% of records independently double-screened. Inclusion criteria were intrapartum births in maternity wards in OECD countries, a measure of midwifery workload, and outcomes related to provision of care, mode of birth, and maternal or neonatal morbidity and mortality. A single reviewer conducted data extraction, bias assessments, and a narrative synthesis.
resultsWe included 23 studies (15 new, 8 from the original review) from the UK, USA, Italy, France, and Germany, covering 2,943,120 births. Only three studies were rated as high quality. Many outcomes showed no significant effects, or inconsistent effects across studies. High workload was significantly linked to care delays, increased instrumental and caesarean births, and some maternal outcomes (e.g., perineal trauma). Associations were modified by maternal characteristics, including clinical risk, parity, and civil status. No significant associations were found between workload and neonatal outcomes, except for one low-quality study reporting increased neonatal ward admissions.
conclusionsHigh midwifery workload may alter care provision, potentially affecting mother and baby outcomes. Further robust research is needed to address limitations in current evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.