ArticlePloS one2025
Making MALDI-TOF MS for entomological parameters accessible: A practical guide for in-house library creation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionisation time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a powerful analytical method that has been used extensively to identify sample ions of complex mixtures, and biological samples such as proteins, tissues and microorganisms. MALDI-TOF MS has revolutionised clinical microbiology with accurate, rapid, and inexpensive species-level identification of microbes. MALDI-TOF MS technology generates spectral signatures and matches them to a library of similar organisms using bioinformatics pattern matching. The use of MALDI-TOF MS for entomological samples has been explored by multiple groups with proven efficacy at differentiating between closely related species, as well as detecting pathogens in different vectors. The low cost per sample processing, rapid turnaround and robustness are attractive for surveillance of vector control programs. Libraries are built in-house for institutional usage, although a multi-user platform with sharing of spectra and data would be attractive. Only a few studies have strived to make their libraries publicly available. Here, we outline a stepwise approach for creating an in-house MALDI-TOF MS library and subsequent query, using malaria vector species identification as a case study for entomological samples. A protocol and video of the methodology are also shared. Moreover, the libraries related to this publication have been deposited in public repository (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VYQFNO37) for anyone with MALDI-TOF MS equipment to adapt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.