Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853944›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A case study of transferring the effect of demographic factors on e-waste recycling to the waste container assignment model.

Tuba Bazancir, Yeşim Ok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tuba BazancirQuality Coordination Department, Trabzon University, Trabzon, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7278-0689
Yeşim OkIndustrial Engineering Department, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8349-7005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collecting waste directly from the consumer could be considered the initial stage of electronic waste recycling. Despite numerous studies employing mathematical assignment models to determine the optimal location of containers for waste collection from end-users, no research has been deemed to incorporate the demographic characteristics of the regions into these assignment models. This study aims to accomplish more effective results by incorporating the factors affecting consumers' recycling trends (the population, income level, education level, and age distribution of the relevant region) into the assignment model. By integrating abovementioned parameters characterizing regional differences in the micro sense and country-based differences in the macro sense into the assignment model, a generic model is structured to help local administrators determine their first-step e-waste recycling policies. The main contribution of the proposed model is that significantly more realistic results regarding the amount of e-waste to be collected can be obtained when factors indicating regional differences are included in the container assignment model. Thus, local governments could utilize these findings as a reference to create more sustainable policies for the next steps of e-waste recycling. The model application is demonstrated through a case study for a local government in Turkey.

Indexed as

Electronic WasteModels, TheoreticalRecyclingDemographyHumansTurkey

Identifiers

PMID40853944
PMCPMC12377600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.