Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853918›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Developing and validating modular surveys for vector-borne diseases: A study protocol.

Skyler Finucane, Alexandria Renault, Mary H Hayden, Kacey Ernst, Sarah Yeo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Skyler FinucaneDepartment of Entomology and Insect Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1351-2185
Alexandria RenaultMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Mary H HaydenLyda Hill Institute for Human Resilience, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, United States of America.
Kacey ErnstMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3346-7788
Sarah YeoThe University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.

Funding

T32 Cancer Prevention and Control Training Program Addressing Health DisparitiesT32CA272303 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Terry A Badger, Gloria D. Coronado · 2023 to 2026
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA272303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vector-borne diseases are an increasing threat to human health and well-being in the United States. Understanding public perception and practices to reduce vector abundance and vector-human contact can guide effective interventions. Nevertheless, vector-borne disease surveys, which are widely used in the field to understand public perception and practices, are often inconsistent in terms of structure and implementation. This protocol is designed to provide guidance for public health professionals and researchers in the development of future knowledge, attitudes, and practices studies by ensuring uniformity in design and structure. This manuscript describes a rigorous three-phase protocol for the development of standardized vector-borne disease survey modules that can be used throughout the United States to generate data that are comparable across diverse regions. During phase one, a workshop with subject matter experts and a comprehensive literature review will be conducted to identify survey domains and generate items of interest. Survey items will also be mapped based on two theoretical frameworks: the Health Belief Model and the Risks, Attitudes, Norms, Abilities, and Self-Regulation framework. Standards across knowledge, attitudes, and practices surveys will enhance the analysis and interpretation of the data across geographies and time. During phase two, a group of expert judges will evaluate survey items based on content relevance, representativeness, and technical quality. During the final phase, cognitive interviews and surveys with target audience groups will be conducted to measure and ensure the face validity, reliability, and external validity of the modules. Participants will be drawn from a diverse range of educational backgrounds and geographic locations. The surveys developed through this protocol will facilitate acquisition of insights into the public's knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning vector-borne diseases, allowing for the collection of comparable data across various regions in the United States.

Indexed as

Vector Borne DiseasesAnimalsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40853918
PMCPMC12377612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.