Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853911›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Understanding the influence of self-concept on clinical decision-making among nurses: A cross-sectional study.

Wasan Aboalrob, Ahmad Ayed, Malakeh Z Malak, Ibrahim Aqtam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wasan AboalrobPalestinian Ministry of Health, Nablus, Palestine.
Ahmad AyedFaculty of Nursing, Arab American University, Jenin, Palestine.ORCID 0000-0003-2164-8183
Malakeh Z MalakCommunity Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Ibrahim AqtamIbn Sina College for Health Professions, Department of Nursing, Nablus University for Vocational and Technical Education, Nablus, Palestine.ORCID 0000-0001-6339-9176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-concept, defined as an individual's perception of their professional identity, competencies, and abilities within their nursing role, significantly influences clinical decision-making (CDM) processes. Clinical decision-making represents a complex cognitive process involving critical thinking, problem-solving, and professional judgment that directly impacts patient safety and care quality. Despite established theoretical frameworks linking self-concept to professional performance, limited empirical research has examined this relationship within the unique socio-cultural and healthcare context of Palestine, where nurses face distinctive challenges including resource constraints, high patient acuity, and systemic pressures. This study aimed to examine the influence of self-concept on Palestinian nurses' clinical decision-making in governmental hospitals.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July 2024 in governmental hospitals across Palestine. A total of 381 nurses working in emergency, medical-surgical, and intensive care units participated, selected through convenience sampling. Participants were recruited from 11 governmental hospitals across northern, middle, and southern regions of Palestine to enhance sample diversity. Data were collected using the validated Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDMNS) and the Nurses' Self-Concept Questionnaire (NSCQ). Cronbach's alpha coefficients for this study were 0.89 for CDMNS and 0.90 for NSCQ, demonstrating strong internal consistency within the Palestinian nursing context.

resultsThe mean nursing self-concept score was 205.5 ± 26.0 out of 288 (indicating moderately high self-concept, representing 71.4% of the maximum possible score), while the mean CDM score was 152.1 ± 22.2 out of 200 (indicating high decision-making confidence, representing 76.1% of the maximum possible score). A significant positive correlation was found between self-concept and CDM (r = 0.609, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis, controlling for age, professional experience, and demographic variables, showed that self-concept was the strongest predictor of CDM (β = 0.641, B = 0.546, p < 0.001), explaining 37.7% of the variance (adjusted R2 = 0.372).

conclusionThis study provides empirical evidence that nurses with higher professional self-concept demonstrate significantly stronger clinical decision-making abilities, even after controlling demographic and professional variables. Targeted interventions (e.g., structured mentorship) to enhance self-concept may improve CDM. However, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and future longitudinal studies are needed to establish temporal relationships. These findings have important implications for nursing education, professional development, and healthcare policy in Palestine and similar contexts.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingNursesSelf ConceptAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiddle EastSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40853911
PMCPMC12377617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.