ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
A suture in time: The ontogeny of cranial suture morphology in mammals.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cranial Suture Joints in SheepVeterinary sciences · 2026Article
- A suture in time: The ontogeny of cranial suture morphology in mammals.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Suture shape and complexity are thought to influence skull function in mammals, supporting the evolution of ecological and morphological diversity. These aspects of suture morphology are seldom studied in a comparative context, especially relative to the multitude of comparative studies of cranial shape. Using a three-dimensional comparative ontogenetic dataset spanning 22 species across the phylogenetic breadth of Mammalia and sampling from foetal to adult stages, we applied 3D geometric morphometrics and 2D complexity metrics to track the evolutionary and developmental morphology of three cranial sutures (interfrontal, sagittal and coronal). Shape and complexity vary across the three sutures, with complexity decreasing through ontogenetic stages for antero-posterior sutures (interfrontal and sagittal) but showing a postnatal increase for transversal sutures (the coronal). This suggests that aging is the strongest influence on longitudinal suture complexity because of simplification and obliteration for sutures subject to tensile stresses. This adulthood trend can be explained by a necessity to consolidate the skull through fusion, coupled with the disappearing need to accommodate further brain growth. Transversally positioned sutures oppose the trend as they are subject to the compressive stresses of cranial mechanics. Additionally, our findings refute the hypothesis that placental mammals have more complex and variable sutures than marsupials reflecting their more disparate ecologies. Rather, developmental history was found to be the greatest influence on suture complexity and variability. As a result, the extreme altriciality of marsupials, and its related longer postnatal brain growth, allows them to match and surpass the suture variability found in most placentals, reaching levels otherwise found mainly in primates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.