Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853762›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2025

Assessing PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma: a prospective study of matched fine-needle aspirates, core biopsies, and resection specimens using alcohol and forming fixatives.

Alexander Haragan, Natalie Kipling, Michael Shackcloth, John R Gosney, Michael P Davies, John K Field

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander HaraganInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9747-563X
Natalie KiplingInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Michael ShackclothInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
John R GosneyInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Michael P DaviesInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
John K FieldInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

AstraZeneca ESR-19-20068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PD-L1 expression for the prediction of response to immune-checkpoint blockade remains the most broadly utilised clinically validated biomarker in a range of tumour types. In this study, we aimed to assess, in a prospectively collected matched cohort, the impact of sampling technique and both formalin and alcohol fixation on PD-L1 expression and heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Patients undergoing surgical resection for NSCLC were consented. Surgical specimens were received directly from theatre and sampled fresh to produce two sets of core biopsies, two fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) and two whole-block tissue sections from each specimen. A matched biopsy, FNA, and whole-block were placed into formalin or an alcohol-based fixative (Cytolyt™) prior to PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assessment. A total of 114 specimens from 57 patients were included. All whole-block cases (100%), 92% of core biopsies, and 88% of FNAs were adequate for PD-L1 expression analysis. Fixation had no significant impact on adequacy, but cytology specimens fixed in alcohol showed a significant reduction in PD-L1 expression, with 25% of cases placed into different clinically relevant categories of PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression by immunochemistry is an exemplar of the challenges of utilising a heterogeneously expressed protein-based predictive biomarker. Regardless of sampling technique, a good quality biopsy or FNA is likely to give a statistically representative PD-L1 expression, although expression ranges close to clinically relevant cut-offs of 1% and 50% remain a source of potential discordance.

Indexed as

B7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFixativesLung NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsy, Fine-NeedleBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleEthanolFemaleFormaldehydeHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanEthanolFixativesFormaldehydeassaydigital microscopyimmunocytochemistrylung

Identifiers

PMID40853762
PMCPMC12377403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.