Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853741›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2025

Students' associations with the STEM acronym and their impact on value beliefs and STEM choices.

Heidrun Stoeger, Anton L Beer, Albert Ziegler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heidrun StoegerFakultät für Humanwissenschaften, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-2804
Anton L BeerFakultät für Humanwissenschaften, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0297-6838
Albert ZieglerInstitut für Psychologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2122-0673

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 16MF1091A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, there have been many campaigns to attract students to STEM study programs and jobs. However, there is little research on whether the target audiences are familiar with the STEM acronym, which specific STEM subject areas they associate with it, and the impact of these associations. We investigated students' familiarity with the STEM acronym and whether their associations of the STEM acronym with different STEM subject areas-mediated by their value beliefs-affected their academic elective intentions for STEM study programs and activities and their STEM choices of curriculum profiles at school. In a sample of eighth-grade students (n = 1163; 611 girls; 13.7 years), 72% reported familiarity with the STEM acronym. Students associated mathematics most strongly with the STEM acronym, followed by physics, computer science, chemistry, biology, and engineering. The subject areas students associate with the STEM acronym affected their academic elective intentions for STEM and their STEM choices at school. These relations were mediated by students' value beliefs and differed for the subject areas associated with the STEM acronym and by gender. The consequences of our findings for tailoring STEM campaigns to ensure their effectiveness and a more diverse and inclusive STEM community are discussed.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorEngineeringMathematicsScienceStudentsAdolescentCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleacademic elective intentionsschool career choicesschool subjectsSTEMvalue beliefs

Identifiers

PMID40853741
PMCPMC12576871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.