ArticleJAMA network open2025
Hospital-Wide Implementation, Clinical Outcomes, and Safety of Phenobarbital for Alcohol Withdrawal.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Phenobarbital Versus Benzodiazepine-Based Pathways for Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmacotherapy · 2026Pooled it
- Hospitalist perspectives and practices in treating hospitalized patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome in the era of phenobarbital re-emergence.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Article
- Real-World Phenobarbital Use, Treatment Escalation, and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.Critical care explorations · 2026Observational
- Phenobarbital as an Adjuvant to benzodiazepines when compared to Single-agent benzodiazepine Treatment (usual care) for Alcohol withdrawal syndrome in the intensive care unit (PASTA): a study protocol.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
- Phenobarbital monotherapy vs benzodiazepines for alcohol withdrawal syndrome: a multicenter propensity-matched comparative effectiveness study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence and clinical correlates of aggressive behavior in male inpatients with alcohol dependence during hospitalization.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Phenobarbital monotherapy is increasingly used to treat alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) in hospitalized patients, but its implementation outside academic emergency departments (EDs) and intensive care units (ICUs) remains understudied. Objective: To evaluate the implementation, clinical outcomes, and safety of an electronic health record (EHR) order set for intravenous weight-based phenobarbital loading (10 or 15 mg/kg) across all care locations (ED, acute care, and ICU) of a community hospital. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective quality improvement study was conducted at a 281-bed community hospital in Seattle, Washington, including all hospitalized adults treated for AWS 11 months before and 12 months after implementation of the phenobarbital EHR order set (April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2023). Data analysis occurred in May 2024. Exposure: Initiation of AWS treatment before vs on or after March 24, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Implementation was assessed by order set use and cumulative phenobarbital and benzodiazepine exposure. Clinical outcomes included daily maximum Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol Scale Revised (CIWA-Ar) scores, AWS treatment duration (time from first to last medication), and time from AWS treatment initiation to hospital discharge. Safety outcomes included prolonged use of physical restraints (>1 day), intubation, and in-hospital mortality. Logistic and negative binomial regression models were used to estimate differences in each outcome, before vs after implementation, adjusting for baseline group differences. Results: Among 254 patients, the preimplementation (154 patients) and postimplementation (100 patients) groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics; most were middle-aged (mean [SD] age, 53.0 [14.9] years), male (177 men [66.9%]), and publicly insured (186 patients [73.2%]). After implementation, the phenobarbital order set was used for 67 patients (67.0%), predominantly in ED and acute care locations. AWS symptoms resolved more rapidly after implementation, with a 4.2- to 5.0-point reduction in daily maximum CIWA-Ar scores at 24 to 96 hours from hospital presentation, 30.1-hour reduction in AWS treatment duration (95% CI, 16.7-43.5 hours), and 2.2-day reduction in time to hospital discharge (95% CI, 0.7-3.7 days). Safety outcomes did not significantly differ before and after implementation. Conclusions and Relevance: In this quality improvement study, implementation of a weight-based phenobarbital order set for AWS in all care locations of a community hospital was associated with faster symptom resolution, shorter length of stay, and no differences in safety outcomes. These findings support the broader adoption of phenobarbital-based AWS treatment across diverse hospital settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.