Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40853608›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025

BRCA testing utilization among commercially insured women with breast or ovarian cancer.

Lu Shi, Katherine Kolor, Zhuo Chen, Ramal Moonesinghe, Juan Rodriguez, Muin J Khoury, Scott D Grosse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lu ShiCenter for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Lu.Shi@tuftsmedicine.org.
Katherine KolorDivision of Blood Disorders and Public Health Genomics, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Zhuo ChenDivision of Blood Disorders and Public Health Genomics, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ramal MoonesingheDivision of Blood Disorders and Public Health Genomics, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Juan RodriguezDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Muin J KhouryDivision of Blood Disorders and Public Health Genomics, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Scott D GrosseOffice of Director, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis report examines utilization of germline BRCA genetic testing among women with breast or ovarian cancer in the context of current clinical guidelines for testing.

methodsLinked IQVIA commercial claims and electronic medical record data were used to analyze BRCA test utilization among women aged 18-64 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer or ovarian cancer during 2016-2021, excluding 2018. Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) comparing utilization of testing by cancer type, age group, race, and year.

resultsAmong commercially insured women with newly diagnosed breast cancer (n = 19,139) or epithelial ovarian cancer (n = 1639), 50 and 47%, respectively, received germline BRCA testing during the study years. BRCA testing rates were higher among women with breast cancer aged 18-50 years (69%) compared to those aged 51-64 years (39%). Overall utilization among women with breast or ovarian cancer was slightly lower in 2021 compared to 2019 and 2020. Compared with White women with breast cancer, Asian women were less likely (PR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.74-0.92]) to receive testing.

conclusionNearly one-third of women who had breast cancer at age 50 or younger and a majority of women with ovarian cancer had no germline BRCA testing recorded within 1 year of diagnosis. Under current (2024) guidelines, these women and their family members are eligible for genetic counseling and testing to guide preventive interventions for future cancers. Healthcare providers have an important role in offering genetic services to women and their families, ensuring that eligible women receive recommended care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic TestingOvarian NeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdministrative Claims, HealthcareAdolescentAdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinElectronic Health RecordsFamilyFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA testBreast cancerOvarian cancerUtilization

Identifiers

PMID40853608
PMCPMC13389926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.